ГОСТ Р 57630-2017/IEC/TS 62736:2016 Техника ультразвуковая. Сканеры эхо-импульсные. Упрощенные методы испытаний на постоянство параметров системы формирования изображений

[1]

EFSUMB, "Guideline for technical quality assurance (TQA) of ultrasound devices (B-Mode) - Version 10" (Kollmann C., Dekorte C., Dudley N.J., Gritzmann N., Martin K., Evans D.H.) Ultraschall in der Medizin 33(6), p.544-549 (2012)

[2]

Padilla F., Carson P.L., van der Spek S., LeCarpentier G., Goodsitt M.M. Toward a truly meaningful method of US-system quality control. In Proc. RSNA 96th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Radiology, 257, abstract only, Chicago, Nov. 28 - Dec. 3, 2010

[3]

King D.M., Hangiandreou N.J., Tradup D.J. and Stekel S.F. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artifacts. Physics in Medicine and Biology 55(23), N557-N570 (2010)

[4]

Hangiandreou N.J., Stekel S.F., Tradup D.J. Four Year Experience with an Ultrasound Quality Control Program, in Proc. Amer. Inst. Ultras. Med. Ann. Conv., J. Ultrasound Med., Suppl., 28 S1, S148-9, New York (2009)

[5]

Hangiandreou N.J., Stekel S.F., Tradup D.J., Gorny K.R., King D.M., Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37(8), p.1350-1357 (2011)

[6]

King D.M., Hangiandreou N.J., Tradup D.J., Stekel S.F. Assessment of three methods for detection of ultrasound artifacts. Medical Physics 38(11), p.6216-6221 (2011)

[7]

O., Mannila V., Vartiainen E., Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound. Eur. J. Radiol. 80(2), p.519-525 (2011)

[8]

Balbis S., Meloni Т., Tofani S., Zenone F., Nucera D., Guiot C., Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment. J. Clin. Ultrasound 40(3), p.167-173 (2012)

[9]

O., Blomqvist P., Jauhiainen M., Т., Malaska P., Mannila V., Vinnurva-Jussila T., Virsula S., "Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging," Acta Radiologica 52(6), p.665-669 (2011)

[10]

M., Olsson M., Segall В., Fraser A.G., Winter R., Brodin , High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice. European Journal of Echocardiography 10(3), p.389-394 (2009)

[11]

Pfandzelter R., Sander G., Balhar T., Langer M., Technical quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound in outpatient care in Germany, Technische Qualitдtssicherung der Ultraschalldiagnostik in der ambulanten Versorgung. Ultraschall in der Medizin 33(6), p.574-580 (2012)

[12]

Shaw A. and Hekkenberg R., Standards to support performance evaluation for diagnostic ultrasound imaging equipment. National Physical Laboratory. NPL Report AC 2. Teddington, UK, 2007. 68 p

[13]

AAPM. Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures, Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No.1, (M.M. Goodsitt, P.L. Carson, D.L. Hykes, J.M. Kofler), Med. Phys. 25 (8) 08-1998

[14]

IPEM. Routine quality assurance of ultrasound imaging systems, (R. Price), Institute for Physics and Engineering in Medicine, Report 71, 2002 (originally published by Institute for Physical Sciences in Medicine, 1995)

[15]

IEC/TS 62791, Ultrasonics - Pulse-echo scanners - Low-echo sphere phantoms and method for performance testing of gray-scale medical ultrasound scanners applicable to a broad range of transducer types

[16]

Shi H., Al-Sadah J., Mackie Т., Zagzebski J., Signal to noise ratio estimates of ultrasound depth of penetration. Med. Phys. 30(6), p.1367-1367 (2003) (Abstract)

[17]

Madsen E.L., Frank G.R., McCormick M.M., Deaner M.E., Stiles T.A. Anechoic sphere phantoms for estimating 3-D resolution of very-high-frequency ultrasound scanners. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Control 57, p.2284-2292 (2010)

[18]

Leys, С et al. Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, p.764-766 (2013)

[19]

AIUM. Standard Methods for Measuring Performance of Pulse-Echo Ultrasound Imaging Equipment. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Laurel, MD, USA (1990)

[20]

Goodsitt M., Carson P.L., Witt S., Hykes D.I., and Kofler J.M. Real Time B-mode Ultrasound Quality Control Test Procedures. Med. Phys. 25, p.1385-1406 (1998)

[21]

K. and Holley G. Ultrasound Imaging System Performance Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2003 Meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, July 2003. Text available at: http://www.aapm.org/meetings/03AM/pdf/9905-9858.pdf

[22]

Ultrasound Accreditation Program Requirements, Amer. Col. Radiol., http://www.acraccreditation.org/~/media/Documents/Ultrasound/Requirements.pdf?la= en, Rev. 5/2/16

[23]

IEC/TS 61390:1996, Ultrasonics - Real-time pulse-echo systems - Test procedures to determine performance specifications

[24]

IEC/TS 62558, Ultrasonics - Real-time pulse-echo scanners - Phantom with cylindrical, artificial cysts in tissue-mimicking material and method for evaluation and periodic testing of 3D-distributions of void-detectability ratio (VDR)

[25]

Gorny K.R., Tradup D.J., Hangiandreou N.J. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control. Med. Phys. 32(8), p.2615-2628 (2005)

[26]

Tradup D., Johnson L., Stekel S., Hangiandreou N. Initial experience with an automated system for measuring ultrasound image quality. J. Ultrasound Med. 26: S230, (2007) March, (Abstract)

[27]

Gibson N., Dudle N., Griffith, K. A computerised quality control testing system for B-mode ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, p.1697-1711 (2001)

[28]

Tissue Substitutes, Phantoms and Computational Modelling in Medical Ultrasound. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report 61. Bethesda, MD, USA (1998)

[29]

Madsen E., Zagzebski J., Banjavic R. and Jutila R. Tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms. Med. Phys. 5, p.391-394 (1978)

[30]

Madsen E. Ultrasonically soft-tissue-mimicking materials. In The Medical Physics of CT and Ultrasound: Tissue Imaging and Characterization, Fullerton G. and Zagzebski J., editors, AAPM Monograph 6, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, New York, NY, USA. p.531-550 (1980)

[31]

Madsen E.L., Frank G.R., Dong F. Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24(4), p.535-542 (1998)

[32]

Wilson Т., Zagzebski J., Li Y.D. A test phantom for estimating changes in the effective frequency of an ultrasonic scanner. J. Ultrasound Med. 21(9), p.937-945 (2002)

[33]

DICOM Standards Committee WG, Ultrasound, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 43: Storage of 3D Ultrasound Images, Apr 10. 2009, (DICOM), Digital Imaging and Communications ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup43_ft.pdf. In Medicine

[34]

IEC 62563-1, Medical electrical equipment - Medical image display systems - Part 1: Evaluation methods

[35]

AAPM Task Group 18 Imaging Informatics Subcommittee, E. Samei, Chair, Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems, AAPM On-Line Report No. 03, College Park, MD., 2005. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03.pdf

[36]

Tague, N.R. Seven Basic Quality Tools. In The Quality Toolbox. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. (2005) p.15. (Includes example control chart in Excel.)

[37]

AIUM. Quality Assurance Manual for Gray Scale Ultrasound Scanners. AIUM Technical Standards Committee, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD, USA p.58-68 (2014)

УДК 616-079

ОКС 11.040.55

Ключевые слова: эхо-импульсный сканер, изображение, ультразвук, медицинское изделие, испытания, контроль качества, фантом, уровни испытаний, дефекты, шаблон