[1] | Thompson M., Ellison S.L.R., Wood R. The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78 (1) pp.145-196 |
[2] | Kuselman I., Fajgelj A. IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants-chemical analyticallaboratories (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82 (5) pp.1099-1135 |
[3] | Helsel D.R. Nondetects and data analysis: statistics for censored environmental data. Wiley Interscience, 2005 Horwitz W. Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulations of food and drugs. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54 pp.67A-76A |
[4] | CCQM Guidance note: Estimation of a consensus KCRV and associated Degrees of Equivalence. Version 10. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Paris (2013) |
[5] | Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, 1997 |
[6] | Efron В., Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, 1993 |
[7] | Thompson M. Analyst (Lond.). 2000, 125 pp.385-386 |
[8] | Horwitz W. Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulations of food and drugs. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54 pp.67A-76A |
[9] | Silverman B.W. Density Estimation. Chapman and Hall, London, 1986 |
[10] | Sheather S.J., Jones M.C. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J.R. Stat. Soc, B. 1991, 53 pp.683-690 |
[11] | van Nuland Y. ISO 9002 and the circle technique. Qual. Eng. 1992, 5 pp.269-291 |
[12] | Gower J.C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics. 1971, 27 (4) pp.857-871 |
[13] | Thompson M., Willetts P., Anderson S., Brereton P., Wood R. Collaborative trials of the sampling of two foodstuffs, wheat and green coffee. Analyst (Lond.). 2002, 127 pp.689-691 |
[14] | Maronna R.A., Martin R.D., Yohai V.J. Robust Statistics: Theory and methods. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, 2006 |
[15] | Uhlig S. Robust estimation of variance components with high breakdown point in the 1-way random effect model. In: Kitsos C.P. and Edler L.; Industrial Statistics; Physica, S. 65-73, 1997 |
[16] | Muller C.H., Uhlig S. Estimation of variance components with high breakdown point and high efficiency; Biometrika; 88: Vol. 2, pp.353-366, 2001 |
[17] | Uhlig S. Robust estimation of between and within laboratory standard deviation measurement results below the detection limit, Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 2015 |
[18] | http://quodata.de/en/web-services/QHampel.html |
[19] | Rousseeuw P.J., Verboven S. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2002, 40 pp.741-758 |
[20] | Analytical Method Committee. Royal Society of Chemistry Accred Qual Assur. 2010, 15 pp.73-79 |
УДК 658.562.012.7:65.012.122:006.354 | ОКС 03.120.30 | Т59 |
Ключевые слова: межлабораторные сравнительные испытания, проверка квалификации, приписанное значение, -индекс, дзета-индекс, согласованная величина, выброс, образец для проверки квалификации, провайдер проверки квалификации, программа проверки квалификации, образец сравнения, сертифицированный образец сравнения CRM |
Редакция документа с учетом
изменений и дополнений подготовлена
АО "Кодекс"